• qarbone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m deliberating between “get rusted!” and simply “Rust” (as an imperative). I like the simplicity of the latter but honestly prefer the first one

    • fracture@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      i don’t love that clanker has been gaining traction because i have friends (plural) who identify as robots (or similar) and i feel like clanker as a perjorative is much more likely to affect them than a generative AI

        • fracture@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          no. you’ve heard of furries, right? it’s not really that much of a leap from there to think a person would identify with mechanical things or robots

          and like i said, clanker is not going to affect an LLM, but it could affect these sorts of people

          • cally [he/they]@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago
            me being nitpicky, feel free to ignore

            no. you’ve heard of furries, right?

            as a furry, i identify with anthropomorphic animals, not as one. the term you’re looking for is therian, or perhaps otherkin. identifying with mechanical things or robots is different as identifying as one.

  • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    You said that Adolf Hitler was bad. If we swapped Hitler with Mr Rogers, you’d look like a fool. You see now the error of your ways and must bow to my superior argument.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    So, what value does AI boyfriend/girlfriend have? It has the value a person attaches to it.

    Lets say someone is self-hosting a LLM and falls in love with it. I then come over and delete this model. What was lost? A file that can easily be recreated was deleted or an object of immense sentimental value that cannot be easily recreated was destroyed? I think court/jury might easily side with the AI lover here. After all it’s easy to understand his attachment and loss, even if it sounds crazy.

    As this progresses we will see more and more people become attached to some LLM (because those will become better at imitating people) and the idea that those should be legally protected will become normalized. When LLMs can form memories and be affected by how people interact with them even calling them names will be considered a crime. It doesn’t mater LLMs are not sentient. All that matters is that people will like to think they are.

    • ghen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think it’s worthwhile to create a distinction though. An LLM girlfriend is about as worthwhile to society as a picture of a deceased relative. It’s an object that might cause inconsolable harm if lost in a fire, but it’s not an object that someone should get the death penalty for destroying.