nebula42@lemmy.zip to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 months agorulelemmy.zipimagemessage-square49linkfedilinkarrow-up1374arrow-down13
arrow-up1371arrow-down1imagerulelemmy.zipnebula42@lemmy.zip to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square49linkfedilink
minus-squareegonallanon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up59arrow-down1·10 months agoI love the government announcing things that were already crimes are still crimes.
minus-squaretyler@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34·10 months agoIt was illegal to own one? I understand using it or carrying in public, but literally owning one???
minus-squareSharkAttak@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up28arrow-down1·10 months agoUsing it is illegal, carrying it in public is cringe.
minus-squaretyler@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·10 months agoCarrying it in public can mean literally displaying it in your front yard in many jurisdictions, so I don’t really agree with your assessment.
minus-squareyumpsuit@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·10 months agoKatana are for courtyards; front yards should be festooned with the bamboo pikes of the ashigaru
minus-squareSharkAttak@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoThat’s a pretty dumb legal definition. Carrying around =/= staying stationary on display.
minus-squaredesktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·10 months agowhat about in self defense? or for hunting? things where bow and arrows are already legal for?
minus-squarefestnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·10 months agofor self defense i’d give a very maybe. nobody is gonna try to rob a person who has a sword and the thing is not exactly hideable also a sword… for hunting? that’ll make the person wielding the sword in more danger than the animals themselves
minus-squaregalanthus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 months agoSwords were never used for hunting. Spears are much better.
minus-squareBearGun@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoBow and arrow are legal for hunting?
minus-squaredesktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 months agoin Alaska you can hunt with a bow and arrow in more places than you can use guns, and crossbows everywhere guns are allowed.
I love the government announcing things that were already crimes are still crimes.
It was illegal to own one? I understand using it or carrying in public, but literally owning one???
Using it is illegal, carrying it in public is cringe.
Carrying it in public can mean literally displaying it in your front yard in many jurisdictions, so I don’t really agree with your assessment.
Katana are for courtyards; front yards should be festooned with the bamboo pikes of the ashigaru
That’s a pretty dumb legal definition. Carrying around =/= staying stationary on display.
what about in self defense? or for hunting? things where bow and arrows are already legal for?
for self defense i’d give a very maybe. nobody is gonna try to rob a person who has a sword and the thing is not exactly hideable
also a sword… for hunting? that’ll make the person wielding the sword in more danger than the animals themselves
Swords were never used for hunting. Spears are much better.
Bow and arrow are legal for hunting?
in Alaska you can hunt with a bow and arrow in more places than you can use guns, and crossbows everywhere guns are allowed.