That and buyers preferring “pretty”/consistent produce, which means supermarkets only want to buy produce to spec because the other stuff won’t sell as well, shelf space is limited and it costs the supermarket more to waste unsold food than to just not buy food unlikely to sell. There are online markets out there that sell “ugly” produce that’s not to spec, but they aren’t broadly popular enough to make a huge dent in waste.
actually you know what … i would probably buy food that looks funny simply for the giggles in it … i’m kinda bored of normativity; “designers” (advertisement people) invent useless garbage new patterns all the time to “mix it up and keep it entertaining” … why not just use non-conformous food that naturally grows that way anyways?
It wouldn’t decrease prices quite as much as you’d think, since so much of the cost of a banana is transportation, which they don’t do with the ones they throw out. They should still do it, obviously, and then transport them on trains to reduce transportation cost as well.
iirc transport on ship is actually cheaper than trains i think due to not needing rails and also ships being fucking huge which means low surface area to volume ratio, so you need less steel to build them.
also how do you build a train line from south america to europe?
Imagine if they actually sold the whole crop to stores. Bananas would be $0.10 a pound. You would never be hungry.
See, you’ve found the issue they’re trying to avoid.
That and buyers preferring “pretty”/consistent produce, which means supermarkets only want to buy produce to spec because the other stuff won’t sell as well, shelf space is limited and it costs the supermarket more to waste unsold food than to just not buy food unlikely to sell. There are online markets out there that sell “ugly” produce that’s not to spec, but they aren’t broadly popular enough to make a huge dent in waste.
*buyers with money. Poor and hungry folk dont get a shit of the food isn’t the perfect shape.
So if I understand corrextly, if the bananas got into shops, they would just be thrown out later and with additional costs.
actually you know what … i would probably buy food that looks funny simply for the giggles in it … i’m kinda bored of normativity; “designers” (advertisement people) invent useless garbage new patterns all the time to “mix it up and keep it entertaining” … why not just use non-conformous food that naturally grows that way anyways?
It wouldn’t decrease prices quite as much as you’d think, since so much of the cost of a banana is transportation, which they don’t do with the ones they throw out. They should still do it, obviously, and then transport them on trains to reduce transportation cost as well.
iirc transport on ship is actually cheaper than trains i think due to not needing rails and also ships being fucking huge which means low surface area to volume ratio, so you need less steel to build them.
also how do you build a train line from south america to europe?
I was comparing to the shipping via trucks that’s done in the US. You do of course need some other method to get them across oceans.
A really really big tunnel? It worked for the chunnel.
Fully automated luxury gay train communism!
Do you know where we can find data on this? The cost of each step that brings bananas to our homes.
Good old artificial scarcity
id imagine there’s a demand for at minimum specialty stores that sell those 40% of bananas
Bananas are already pretty cheap. I think they are the cheapest fruit in the grocery store.