DytallixB@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoWhite House Faith Officelemmy.worldimagemessage-square165linkfedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down120
arrow-up11.26Karrow-down1imageWhite House Faith Officelemmy.worldDytallixB@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square165linkfedilink
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·1 year agoDoes anyone know the correct procedure to challenge it? It’s only illegal if the laws are enforced.
minus-squareExcrubulent@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28·1 year agoYou know, laws? Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in a stew?
minus-squareroot_beer@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·1 year agoYep, that’s p much what they’re doing with’m They’re not nearly as delicious tho
minus-square✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·edit-21 year agoYou need to have standing, which if the only impact is Congress’s budget then only Congress does. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flast_v._Cohen for establishment clause standing by regular taxpayers. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hein_v._Freedom_From_Religion_Foundation for the court throwing that out for the executive. They’d likely throw the whole thing out now.
minus-squareMannimarco@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agodeleted by creator
No, totally unconstitutional.
Does anyone know the correct procedure to challenge it? It’s only illegal if the laws are enforced.
What’s laws, precious?
You know, laws? Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in a stew?
Yep, that’s p much what they’re doing with’m They’re not nearly as delicious tho
You need to have standing, which if the only impact is Congress’s budget then only Congress does.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flast_v._Cohen for establishment clause standing by regular taxpayers. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hein_v._Freedom_From_Religion_Foundation for the court throwing that out for the executive. They’d likely throw the whole thing out now.
lol
deleted by creator