They’re filled with forever chemicals and asbestos. Unironically how a small but old treat company near me got shut down, good riddance tasted like plaster the one time I had one of their so called treats.
Lmao, what are you even trying to say here, dude? Get a grip. Calm down. So fuckin angry at the idea that someone questions your violent tendencies. Gee, I wonder if that anger is proof in itself of your violent tendencies.
Dude I have autism and PTSD, I am nothing but rage. But it’s not necessarily a matter of getting angry at you questioning it per se but more so what I perceive as moral absolutism against violence. I generally take the position against pacifism on an individual level, mostly because 9/10 Americans are all bark no bite which is rather bad with the whole rise of fascism thing. The most expedited method to stopping fascists is to start the killing of them as soon as possible which was about 50 years ago with the foundation of the “moral majority”.
This erroneously assumes new fascists aren’t being born every day. It also erroneously assumes that the threat of retribution deters things like fascism, or crime in general. It’s a weird sort of eugenics where “if we just kill all the fascists there won’t be anymore ever.”
The point isn’t to kill them all it’s to kill their leaders and make examples of them. Do you really think many folks would’ve wanted to cheerfully read off aids death lists back in the 80s if Rush Limbaugh had been vaporized by a car bomb?
Fascists are inherently cowards who back down when an example is made of their louder fellows, there’s a reason they mostly do actions in groups and it’s because they know they’ll get their shit kicked in otherwise. The problem is that this shit kicking is not extended to the leaders, for the sake of so called civility.
I dunno man plenty of science shows that being put to death does basically fuck-all to prevent other people from committing the same kind of crimes. You can hide behind the hope that they’re cowards all you want, but that’s still leaning on assumptions.
Violent. Brainrot.
Says the person who comes across as a moral absolutist. Do you want a cookie profligate?
Lmao, sure I love cookies.
They’re filled with forever chemicals and asbestos. Unironically how a small but old treat company near me got shut down, good riddance tasted like plaster the one time I had one of their so called treats.
Lmao, what are you even trying to say here, dude? Get a grip. Calm down. So fuckin angry at the idea that someone questions your violent tendencies. Gee, I wonder if that anger is proof in itself of your violent tendencies.
Dude I have autism and PTSD, I am nothing but rage. But it’s not necessarily a matter of getting angry at you questioning it per se but more so what I perceive as moral absolutism against violence. I generally take the position against pacifism on an individual level, mostly because 9/10 Americans are all bark no bite which is rather bad with the whole rise of fascism thing. The most expedited method to stopping fascists is to start the killing of them as soon as possible which was about 50 years ago with the foundation of the “moral majority”.
This erroneously assumes new fascists aren’t being born every day. It also erroneously assumes that the threat of retribution deters things like fascism, or crime in general. It’s a weird sort of eugenics where “if we just kill all the fascists there won’t be anymore ever.”
The point isn’t to kill them all it’s to kill their leaders and make examples of them. Do you really think many folks would’ve wanted to cheerfully read off aids death lists back in the 80s if Rush Limbaugh had been vaporized by a car bomb?
Fascists are inherently cowards who back down when an example is made of their louder fellows, there’s a reason they mostly do actions in groups and it’s because they know they’ll get their shit kicked in otherwise. The problem is that this shit kicking is not extended to the leaders, for the sake of so called civility.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/evidence-does-not-support-the-use-of-the-death-penalty/
I dunno man plenty of science shows that being put to death does basically fuck-all to prevent other people from committing the same kind of crimes. You can hide behind the hope that they’re cowards all you want, but that’s still leaning on assumptions.