sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agoData hoarding rulefiles.catbox.moevideomessage-square41linkfedilinkarrow-up1313arrow-down19
arrow-up1304arrow-down1videoData hoarding rulefiles.catbox.moesad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square41linkfedilink
minus-squarePastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 day agoA few comments as yours is close and I’m too lazy to do the write up myself, bumming off your work: Nyquist frequency is half the sample, so your effective pixel for visible light will actually be at 380nm / 2 An electron microscope can capture down to 2 nm so actually 2 PB is a limiting factor for that! 29.6nm would definitely be possible. Image compression ratio (assuming PNG) would probably be 2-4, so the actual pixel size would be sqrt(29.6) to 29.6 / 2.
A few comments as yours is close and I’m too lazy to do the write up myself, bumming off your work: