QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agono rulessh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square31linkfedilinkarrow-up1393arrow-down13
arrow-up1390arrow-down1imageno rulessh.itjust.worksQuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square31linkfedilink
minus-squareYoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up48·2 days agoHmmm…seems too ambiguous - gotta use standard syntax, hold up… ^(s|t)?hey?(?!m)$ ^t?h(e|i)(m|r)$ ^t?h(e|i){1,2}r?s$ Much better.
minus-squareYoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 day agoYeah I gave up on narrowing the scope, I ain’t that dedicated to the bit
minus-squarekibiz0r@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 day agoYou’re not necessarily wrong for it. The source material is nonsense to begin with, so who’s to say what the right test cases are?
minus-squaredeath_to_carrots@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 day agoI don’t see the problem.
Hmmm…seems too ambiguous - gotta use standard syntax, hold up…
^(s|t)?hey?(?!m)$^t?h(e|i)(m|r)$^t?h(e|i){1,2}r?s$Much better.
^(they|he|she)$
Passes:
Michael Jackson intensifies
Yeah I gave up on narrowing the scope, I ain’t that dedicated to the bit
You’re not necessarily wrong for it. The source material is nonsense to begin with, so who’s to say what the right test cases are?
shem
slaanesh will be pleased
I don’t see the problem.
Regex vibes