• callouscomic@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago
    1. Escalates the angry driver situation.
    2. Takes photos while driving.

    Neither driver here is in the right.

      • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The engineers only make the designed safe speed. Government officials make the listed limit. It used to be EXTREMELY popular for government official to knock 20-25% off the design limit of the road, ironically so they can tell everyone how safe they were.

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Everywhere in my town was 25mph until about 10 years ago.

          A local politician got a few speeding tickets and went nuts over it, now it varies from 25-60mph. Engineers were brought in to advise on safe limits.

          Him getting those tickets was one of the best things that ever happened to me. It was so miserable driving so slow on big open roads. I could probably sit down and figure up an insane amount of time I’ve saved over the last decade (if I weren’t an idiot).

            • theangryseal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              No one is traveling on a bicycle or walking here. These roads are empty, there’s nothing there. I live in one of the most rural places in the country (United States).

              It was seriously 20 miles straight with no houses, wide road, 25 mph. In residential areas there are still 25 mph speed limits.

              On our 4 lane road, bicycles are not allowed, yet the speed limit was only 35-40.

              Where there are sidewalks, the speed limit is 25 mph. If there are buildings, 25 mph.

              Empty roads with nothing but fucking trees should not be 25 mph.

              In all of my years driving on those roads, I don’t even think I’ve ever seen a bicycle. A couple of those tiny, slow motorcycles, maybe. I guess they call them scooters

              • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                And why do you think this is the case? Could it possibly be because the infrastructure is completely designed for cars, and using anything else is just not safe so you’d have to be a madman to go with these options?

                Imran sure, I get rural, cars are good for rural areas, but not for towns etc.

                • theangryseal@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Well, I mean, if a person wants to ride a bike 40 miles for 4 1/2 hours to the nearest Walmart I’m sure they could.

                  About 4,500 people live here and most of them have cars or they’re stuck.

                  We have public transit but about 30 people use it. My neighbor said it’s a 2.5 hour ordeal to go to the post office when he could be there and back in 20 minutes in a car. He got old and lost his license.

    • klemptor@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I disagree. There are two roads near me with a limit of 55 mph, and traffic on those roads regularly moves at 75-80. Driving 55 becomes dangerous when all of the other traffic is going so much faster, because nobody expects you to be that slow. You risk getting rear-ended, and if traffic is heavy, people who end up behind you now have to merge into a much faster lane of traffic to get around you.

      • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Why don’t they confiscate driving licences and imprison all the criminals who are driving 20-25mph dangerously over the limit?

        • klemptor@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Throw people in jail for driving too fast? That seems pretty extreme.

          It’s hard to police speeding on a highway. Typically if you do get pulled over for speeding, it’s because you’re going way faster than those around you. So even in a 55, if everyone’s doing 80, you’ve gotta be doing 95 or more for a cop to single you out and arrest you. (Or maybe the cop has a quota to meet.) And where I live, local cops can’t use radar, so it’s hard to prove how fast you were going.

          And then if you do get arrested, you’re most likely to get a ticket and points on your license. Get enough points and they’ll take away your license, but that means you’ve been caught repeatedly. And points expire eventually, plus if you go to your court date and plead not guilty, a lot of the time the judge will just remove the points. So a speeding ticket from years ago generally won’t have any bearing on your life except for the cost of the ticket.

          So within reason, you can pretty much speed all the time consequence-free ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This comment section is a very good case study in why better public transportation is absolutely necessary: a lot of you should not ever drive.