IO 😇@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agotech rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square20linkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down10
arrow-up14arrow-down1imagetech rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneIO 😇@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square20linkfedilink
minus-squareL0rdMathias@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoThat’s gotta be suuuper fast, like at least 15 images per second.
minus-squareIO 😇@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoexposing humans to such a rapid succession of visual stimuly would drive anyone insane
minus-squareTriflingToad@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoI watch formula 1 at 30 frames a second for hours a week and I can now talk to myself about drivers teams and tires for hours on end
minus-squareevidences@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoFor smooth video playback you want 23.976 images per second. You could do 30 if you really want but the human eye doesn’t get any benefit from more than 30.
That’s gotta be suuuper fast, like at least 15 images per second.
exposing humans to such a rapid succession of visual stimuly would drive anyone insane
I watch formula 1 at 30 frames a second for hours a week and I can now talk to myself about drivers teams and tires for hours on end
For smooth video playback you want 23.976 images per second. You could do 30 if you really want but the human eye doesn’t get any benefit from more than 30.