• TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    It essentially has the same issue. How many scenarios can we think of that need something that can crawl into rubble or explore irregular caves, but without the ability to climb? It’s what happens when a design’s aesthetic is developed before its function.

    When aesthetics is the selling point of an engineering project then the aesthetics is its purpose. In this case it’s to advertise a university’s research department.

    • SparroHawc@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Running cables through conduit is one example that comes to mind. You need something to drag the lead, and if there’s corners or something that thwarts using a fish tape, this kind of robot would be perfect.

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s still not as effective as the current means. Plus, this would only hypothetically work on conduit that doesn’t elevate or go vertical. It’s cheaper and faster to just apply a shop vacuum to the conduit and suck a ball with a line through.

        • SparroHawc@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          If the robot is the right size, it would be able to move vertically.

          Mind you, you’re right, but new methods of locomotion can come in useful in surprising ways that you and I haven’t thought of.