• Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 days ago

    How does something like that happen? Did google make a machine to interpret the b&w representations? Surely a person would have read the text “yellow” at some point in the process.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Unicode is now adding legacy computing symbols with character sets for old computers like PET, even very obscure ones. Meanwhile Android 4.4 was installed on hundreds of millions of devices. Maybe there’ll be a hairy heart one day, perhaps by allowing the modifier sequence of colored heart + hair color?

    They’re trying to emulate the look of the original in the reference design. Otherwise, I don’t see how

    1CC50 𜱐 ALIEN CRAB STEPPING RIGHT
    1CC51 𜱑 ALIEN CRAB STEPPING LEFT
    

    are very much not mirror images of eacb other.

  • username_1@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    Because Unicode supposed to be a universal way for forming letters, not cater to stupid kids. Throw out that emoji shit out of Unicode!

    • Cellari@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I remembered something from years ago. Maybe 20 years or more. I sent a message to my friend, either through MSN or SMS, and the emojis I sent were different ones on the receiving end. Either it was the case for a different language settings or a different phone manufacturer or both.

      Anyway, if we had unicode back then it would not have happened. Really a minor story though, I would not make importance of it.

      • username_1@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It is still the case to some extent: the look of emojis is controlled by the font, not the Unicode per se. So the mountain pictogram in some font is a colorful image of the mountain, but on other font it is just a triangle.

    • forestbeasts@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago
      ┌────┬─────────────────┬────┐
      │ 🐺 │ Unicode is fun! │ ✨ │
      ├────┴─────────────────┴────┤
      │ Never heard of ASCII art? │
      └────────────────┬──────────┤
                       │ -- Frost │
                       └──────────┘
      
      • username_1@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Don’t start with pseudographics. Unicode completely failed the task. Unicode pseudographics is incomplete (mostly noticeable in lack of the symmetrical chars) and this situation is not intended to improve. But they are always ready to add more stupid emojis.