Conservatives/Shills I made delete their accounts in shame by beating them in arguments : 2
Past winners :
@Acoltc@lemm.ee
@MasterPain@lemmy.world
Honorable mentions:
the goldfish is male??
I miss going for pub lunches on fridays with the team at lunch.
KKHHHHH
this is exactly why people don’t fucking get why we need men’s day. It’s november 19th, no one fucking remembers or gives a shit.
Would you rather be forty and look forty, or be forty and look like a 25 year old lizard?
-Bill Burr
yep, which is why a lot of the magic team ups in DC start with superman getting owned.
nah, shower stuff is excellent
Forced Gender Reassignment
I don’t think that person is trans , just tourtured?
here’s one now, get him!
I’ve heard them being good for pregnant women.
My wife got a similar pillow that looked like giant trousers when she was pregnant
This vodka goes down smooth! Almost no taste, that’s how you know it’s good.
Vodka drinkers are alcoholics with no taste, prove me wrong
Ok, so why is the visual idea that some computer hobbyist came up with but didn’t have the artistic capability to create not something interesting to you?
They paint nothing but enter painter’s competitions.
Yeah, so that’s a stupid thing that individual humans are doing. If you “hand made” a 3d model in Blender and printed it out and submitted it to a painting competition, you are not doing something right.
You get credit for the things you do, and not for the things you don’t.
So the banana guy doesn’t get credit for making the piece. what did they actually do then? This is my point: Either the banana guy is doing nothing and getting paid shitloads, in which case, not art, (lots of ) humans make trash, here’s an example, which means the AI guy is also not an artist, so fine.
Or Banana guy is an artist because he came up with the concept and is an artist, and so is the AI guy because he also came up with the concept.
I’m fine with either. I’m not fine with “banana guy is an artist, AI guy is not”
the vast majority of human art lacks the real nuance and emotional impact real art carries.
It by-definition does not. The fact that you can’t see this I think makes you an inhuman monster.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon’s_law
The top 40 charts of music? 35 out of the 40 are pure crap, manufactured by people that are playing it by the numbers based on market studies, all in the pursuit of money. Now on top of that, imagine the majority of amateur fluff that people produce that are just low quality, or things that people make that aren’t full of gravitas, nuance and actually emotionally impactful.
No man, that doesn’t mean that. I’m saying the artist for the banana piece is depending on the curator to do the actual creation of the piece, just like the guy writing the prompts for the AI is depending on the AI to create the piece.
probably a MK fatality
related standup :
weird. His estate doesn’t have a site to sell tacky t shirts and mugs with his face or something?