• 9 Posts
  • 118 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 1st, 2024

help-circle



  • My favorite are the satanic conspiracy ones. Like where there’s literally a satan who is directing their devils and worshippers to lead people to commit sins.

    My next favorite are the ones that are just telling people to believe in the christian god and to follow the christian moral code and that they will suffer eternally if they don’t. These are occasionally moving.

    The ones I dislike are the rest, which are mostly promoting bigotry against other religions or that have extremist views like you mention.

    btw if you haven’t seen it, check out the “Dark Dungeons” short film; it was made by some independent filmmakers who got Chick’s permission to adapt one of the tracts. They play it (mostly) straight with just the right touches of satire, and it comes off beautifully:

    (the video says “preview” but the full playlist is the full movie)







  • Sergio@slrpnk.netto196@lemmy.blahaj.zone"Anomalocaris" rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 days ago

    Seems like it’d work better if you made a limerick out of it. Gilbert & Sullivan got a lot of mileage out of the fact that multisyllabic rhymes are kinda funny.

    There was a young woman from Paris
    Who voted for Kamala Harris
    She …
    And …
    But not with Anomalocaris.

    I dunno, we’d have to fill in the blanks.





  • On what basis comes the conclusion that there is no architect behind it?

    That’s a great point - if there are divine beings, they wouldn’t necessarily build the universe using a bunch of elves or something – better to spark a Big Bang with the right starting conditions and let everything develop from there. I think it’s more correct to say that evolution and modern physical cosmology provide an explanation of how and why the universe exists without necessarily needing divine intervention.


  • I’ll go farther and say that its wrong.

    Well, it’s debatable but I think it comes down to defining your terms.

    • “Evolution is blind” suggests no guidance at all, and as you say there is randomness, but an important part of the evolutionary process is survival and propagation which are guided by the environment. so arguably evolution is NOT blind.
    • However the evolutionary process is reactive and does not involve long-term planning so you could argue that “blind” means “looking ahead, considering more than what you can immediately sense.” so arguably evolution IS blind.

    Either perspective agrees that there is no “Grand Architect” and/or “God’s Plan” which I think is the general point being made. But it’s just a little distracting.