ickplant@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agoDiabolicallemmy.worldimagemessage-square45linkfedilinkarrow-up11.07Karrow-down19
arrow-up11.06Karrow-down1imageDiabolicallemmy.worldickplant@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square45linkfedilink
minus-squarevateso5074@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down15·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarevillage604@adultswim.fanlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoThen that snippet wouldn’t be admissible in court.
minus-squarevateso5074@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down6·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareVerat@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 months agoIf the prosecution obtains it as evidence, I would think evidence handling procedure would make said discarding a no-go.
minus-squarevateso5074@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down7·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareSerinus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·2 months agoHow many things will you make up to avoid just being wrong? You should try AI. It’s pretty good at telling you what you want to hear.
minus-squarevateso5074@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
deleted by creator
Then that snippet wouldn’t be admissible in court.
deleted by creator
If the prosecution obtains it as evidence, I would think evidence handling procedure would make said discarding a no-go.
deleted by creator
How many things will you make up to avoid just being wrong?
You should try AI. It’s pretty good at telling you what you want to hear.
deleted by creator