8/10. -4 for unneeded weight, -3 for asymmetry making prongs short, +5 for actually sharp prongs. Looking at you, every other “fork” out there you.
Reminds me of an early Bart Simpson
Looks like Barts older cousin
Fuck OP for posting this awful fork/10
I immediately downvoted this fork… then scrolled back because I hate the fork, not the post. -238/10
Because that fork has trisomy 21.
If I got it at Goodwill for $.10, 6/10 because obviously that’s a manufacturing dud but I’ll give it a good home and use it when all the other utensils are dirty.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see this pathetic waste in some Michelin star restaurant pretending it’s trendy and they wasted hundreds buying 200 for $15 each. In that case -5/10.
Nah the michelin waste should be higher because some rich asshole lost an investment and some chef got a dream job for a while.
This fork isn’t stamped out of sheet steel. It appears to have been forged out of a round bar stock. For that alone, it receives high marks, despite the unconventional appearance.
8/10.
- I hate it, but it appears functional
Insulting/purely decorative out of 10.
Knork/10
Not specific but technically follows the set rating system
Limited usefulness because it’s too narrow. Don’t like the asymmetry. Appearance looks a little crude. I wouldn’t want one. Tines seem overly sharp.
Probably good for getting olives out of jars.
3/10. Not great, Bob.
Crab Fork
8/10 dependent on reasonably sized crab to accommodate.
Also good for oysters!
I like the 3 increasing gaps in the tines.
8/10 dessert fork conversation piece.
Also stealthy stabby. Might hide in a hidden emergency drawer.