i’m reading it as a dig on things that are indicative of his general demeanour and the way he has historically wished to be perceived. it’s not about smoking weed and banging hoes (both of which i must point out are illegal in most of the world still), it’s about being someone who hoes weeds and bangs smoke, and then drawing the line at a queer couple. it’s not “a person”, it’s specifically snoop.
in that situation, him also having produced pornos lines up.
And thats problematic in just… So many fucking ways.
Like i genuinely dont even know where to start, but maybe: it feels a little homophobic, and also you’re accepting the puritanical cultural framework of what is and isn’t transgressive, that makes a drag queen reading books to kids more outrageous than avpriest fucking them.
i’m reading it as a dig on things that are indicative of his general demeanour and the way he has historically wished to be perceived. it’s not about smoking weed and banging hoes (both of which i must point out are illegal in most of the world still), it’s about being someone who hoes weeds and bangs smoke, and then drawing the line at a queer couple. it’s not “a person”, it’s specifically snoop.
in that situation, him also having produced pornos lines up.
And thats problematic in just… So many fucking ways.
Like i genuinely dont even know where to start, but maybe: it feels a little homophobic, and also you’re accepting the puritanical cultural framework of what is and isn’t transgressive, that makes a drag queen reading books to kids more outrageous than avpriest fucking them.
no? i’m talking about a single person. i’m not generalising in any way.
nowhere did i state that any of the things he’s done are wrong or right, simply that he has inconsistent beliefs. my own beliefs did not come into it.
What you center in discourse is part of the message tho.
elaborate.