Because there is zero need for same sex political discourse to be shoehorned into a friggin kids cartoon.
Yes, a cartoon lesbian couple is highly inappropriate for the grandson of a drug huffing, ho banging gangster.
“well baby snoop it’s called adoption” as if they’d have a problem explaining little orphan Annie or Stuart little or any number of adopted children
I hate this argument. “You people can’t exist in public because I might have to talk to my stupid kids”.
It’s not a question of being visible in public, it’s just a question of proportion. Hollywood seems to need gays and lesbians in every movie now. Is it marketing to attract “minorities” ?
Yeah, there’s nothing wrong with people being gay as long as they do it in secret and “normal” people don’t have to acknowledge it. /s
My comment refers to overrepresentation.
No such thing.
Around 5% of the population. So yes it’s overrepresented
Let me repeat myself: there is no such thing as “overrepresentation”. There isn’t, and shouldn’t be, a moral or legal law that states that TV and movie producers have to follow census data strictly in their casting. That would be stupid.
It seems to me that films are supposed to be as close to reality as possible to be credible.
If this is real, he’s lost all street cred.
Based Snoop
People getting angry about a comment made three years ago like it was just said today… Im getting reddit karma chasing vibes.
