violet08_@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agoSNSD the GOAT🫶lemmy.worldimagemessage-square63linkfedilinkarrow-up1510arrow-down15
arrow-up1505arrow-down1imageSNSD the GOAT🫶lemmy.worldviolet08_@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square63linkfedilink
minus-squareCoolCat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·14 hours agoYou can easily test if they’re in someone’s system with a saliva test, so your argument doesn’t make any sense.
minus-squarevillage604@adultswim.fanlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·11 hours agoBlood test is better for weed. It’s only detectable for 12h vs 24h with saliva. But levels of THC aren’t really correlated with impairment.
minus-squareCoolCat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·10 hours ago12 to 24h seems good (maybe even too long imho) in the context of driving a car.
minus-squarevillage604@adultswim.fanlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·10 hours agoNot when the levels have no bearing on intoxication.
minus-squareHappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·8 hours agoCan you hook a saliva test to a car’s ignition system to only allow sober people to start the car?
You can easily test if they’re in someone’s system with a saliva test, so your argument doesn’t make any sense.
Blood test is better for weed. It’s only detectable for 12h vs 24h with saliva.
But levels of THC aren’t really correlated with impairment.
12 to 24h seems good (maybe even too long imho) in the context of driving a car.
Not when the levels have no bearing on intoxication.
Can you hook a saliva test to a car’s ignition system to only allow sober people to start the car?