amazing
- 5 Posts
- 13 Comments
Woah I never read into it at that depth but thanks for sharing!
That’s so odd they would only compare the lower and upper bounds of the 95% CI instead of staying in the middle? Sounds very strange.But yes good point about the global aspect of the study throwing in a wrench
Did you read the blurb? What were the main points in this? Asking for a friend
Oh no, they could find me. It’s just the misspelling of beach caused it to not have any search results.
Which is a little interesting because Google usually corrects wrong spellings.
Honestly so sweet.
.
:3
Actually on a relevant note, Stanford conducted a meta-analytical systematic study of penile lengths over the last 29 years, and it caused some concern over the potential negatives in things like fertility, and other reproductive health issues stemming from the observed increase in the average length. It went up by about 25% to 6 inches from the earlier 4.8.
https://med.stanford.edu/news/insights/2023/02/is-an-increase-in-penile-length-cause-for-concern.html
(I don’t know this off the top of my head (brain) BTW, I just refreshed my memory now when getting the link lol)
It aired on the British Channel 4 apparently https://www.channel4.com/programmes/my-massive
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/tv/channel-4-fans-gobsmacked-massive-28320025
Aww that’s kinda sad.
Still, awesome edit though
Terrible apologies and my deepest condolences, especially for that train full of men engaged in masturbation right now. I concede that it is my fault, and have now spoilered the post as my means of a corrective measure.
Thank you
onionsinmypores@sh.itjust.worksto 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone•peak perfor(ule)mance [OC, no ai]English2·2 days agoI agreee
I hope this is not edited. life is a simulation polo man figured out that day
Not yet but I am trying perilously