insurrection

I’m not cracking my case. I just leave the screen open

I have my lidswitch disabled on my Debian server, but if it’s not open the MacBook won’t boot.

you ignored the only noun in the description. it’s not nitpicking.

there is no society without people.

I flat out defined it and your claimed nothing could ever meet the definition

this is the height of bad faith, no-true-scotsman, illiterate Reddit or engagement.

“Just because you string words together does not mean they mean something. If people don’t own/control the means of production, someone else does. Either you have private capital or a governing body. Calling it “stateless society” means nothing. That is actual handwaving of real issues.”

communism is a stateless classless moneyless society. your semantic game doesn’t change the facts

“Yes, it is handwaving, because I ain’t spending time writing paragraphs of shit anyone with two brain cells to rub together can easily figure out on their own.”

this also is not evidence

human nature is not an explanation, it is hand waiving. and communism is a stateless society. no one should believe anything you’ve said here.

there is a cure for political illiteracy.

I’m just a practiced straight man. you gotta practice clowning on a fool

it’s not a career. it’s a theory of ethics

slow your roll. I’m a deontologist. I agree with Lisa. but I’m down to find all the fights I can in this comment section.

this is bait, and I’m hooked

I went with a pocket full of anarchist flyers and a sign that got people asking me about it. I got to distribute about 30 flyers in my fairly rural town.

I swapped signal info with one young punk.

I know the thrust of the entire things was pretty liberal but there were some read happenings going on under the surface, and I don’t feel I wasted my time at all.

if you want to just live in your feelings about this instead of relying on the science, I can’t stop you. but anyone else who reads this should understand that what you claimed simply isn’t scientific fact.

this isn’t proof of understanding personal mortality

we have something we haven’t been able to prove exists in any other animal: knowledge that we, ourselves, might die. animal cognitive behaviorists call this understanding personal mortality, and every time they get close to it, I’ve seen them go out of their way to say they don’t have proof any other animal understands personal mortality.

if you have an animal cognitive behavioral study that claims otherwise, I’d be happy to read it.

say what you want to say. I don’t care for your interrogation.

sure: people are different and unpredictable.

this isn’t proof of causation. it’s pure post hoc ergo propter hoc