you may define life however you like; the thing I said still makes sense regardless of definition (0 or many)

My experience with random processes: on large scales, things either happen 0 times or many times. So I find the idea that life exists in only one place pretty implausible.

Here’s the tweet. It was not a policy per se but the appointment of Gail Slater.

I heard he tweeted in favour of one of the policy’s the GOP implemented. What else has he done?

Your mockery of republicans is indistinguishable from actual republicans. You are serving only to swell their ranks.

>:(

He’d just be doing that to harass women for breaking the rule.

I do feel bad for people born in the year 1488 though, their usernames look really suspicious.

I randomly download scattered memes that I will want to repost endlessly in the future. I assume other people do the same.

there are two distinct whole-tone scales

In the distant future, when we look back on scattered social media caps, we will regret that the date of posting is not shown. Like scattered pages from books unknown, page numbers elided.

To be honest I thought tech bros are what you get when you fit into all of the boxes on both sides.

My absolute favourite thing is women doing things that “only men do.”

(P.S. am a woman)

Disclaimer: I don’t really believe this – but the counter-argument would be to the one on the left: “why does it matter if the man is trans?” (which is a numbskull counterargument, but it fits in the context of the question on the right.) It’s just dumb to put those two boxes next to each other IMO because it draws a very stupid venn diagram.

okay I do agree that calling people eggs is problematic, but this argument sucks. You can’t both ask me to treat FtM people differently from men and ask me to treat them the same as men. The reason you don’t call someone an egg is because their gender is none of your business.