Who doesn’t like a bit of crazy?
Who doesn’t like a bit of crazy?
It’s spelled Elon Musk actually.
I really like those games. I just don’t want to be a character in them.
Yeah! Thank god that isn’t a thing! Also does anyone have the blueprints for tearblast arrows?
Pesticides, same as always.
It’s clearly a rock coloured silicone egg for people with an oviposition fetish.
I’m pretty sure they only mean birthright citizenship for non white people.
That’s actually happened a couple of times in Denmark (accidentally and after the sketch was released) https://www.tv2.no/nyheter/utenriks/span-data-lab-colortxt-blue-classtxt-blue-idext-gen1386kamelasa/span-dansk-kjopmann-skulle-ha-270-liter-melk-fikk-2575-liter/7268663/
Well your kid won’t get citizenship, but you’ll be able to afford to birth them.
I think trump is more of a kazoo.
Laughs in Scottish.
The reason Trump is talking about annexing Canada is that Musk wants him to. Musk’s mother is Canadian and born in Regina. This would make musk a natural born citizen of the United States and eligible to become president god emperor for life.
Yay, horizon irl!
Bay of Tristan da Cunha.
My point is that noone is looking at the IRA and crying mental illness. Furthermore, if you look at the Wikipedia pages for people like Anders Behring Breivik, Ted Kaczynski, and Timothy McVeigh, they all refer to them as terrorists. Whereas people like James Holmes are listed as mass murderers because their crimes were not politically motivated.
So if someone has a heart attack while driving and their car plows into a busy shopping street. Then whether or not they are regarded as a terrorist depends on whether or not someone tries to ban old people from driving because of it?
Or to ask a different question, how would you define terrorism? Because the Oxford English dictionary definition is:
“The calculated use of violence or threat of violence to inculcate fear. Terrorism is intended to coerce or intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.”
That last bit sort of discounts the majority of gun violence generally. And yes in terms of the result, it is splitting hairs. But, knowing the motivation behind a crime is important. You’re going to have more success preventing school shootings by investing in mental health services than you will in anti terrorism policing.
Also if two separate people wake up one morning and person A decides to kill the first person he sees. Person Bdecides to kill the first black person he sees. They both end up killing a black man, and both end up in prison. During rehabilitation, if you treat both as a hate crime, then you’re not properly addressing the violent impulses with person A and if you only address the violent behaviour then you aren’t addressing the underlying racism in person B. Motivation matters in how things are handled generally.
For it to be terrorism it has to be motivated by political or religious ideology. So all the highschool kids who snap and murder a bunch of their classmates: not terrorism. However: the IRA or Timothy McVeigh or the Unabomber: definitely terrorism.
Can’t really make it worse, at this point.
Yes! Hard same!