That’s just standard comic book style, looks like comic sans esque, which is directly based on comic book fonts.
That’s just standard comic book style, looks like comic sans esque, which is directly based on comic book fonts.
The free to fuck the land up I guess.
Don’t fish jump out of the water all the time?
Dads an adult they can learn and pass the knowledge on.
Wouldn’t the fried food already symbolize that though?
Private prisons still operate under government oversite and with government founding….
And maybe having private prisons is its own issue entirely…?
That logic still makes no sense and is flawed at its basic starting point. A prison isn’t gonna raise money to get its inmates removed lmfao, they wouldn’t need money, they would just you know… let them out… fuck people are stupid and can’t think for more than 2 seconds.
And none of those people stopped to think for more than 2 seconds. That’s not even a valid line of reasoning.
A prison isn’t going to lease their inmates to a company that wants to get inmates released.
And none of that implies anything about it being “in a prison”
Critical thinking is a seriously lacking trait in today’s age….
You seriously thought a prison would lease its inmates to a company trying to release said inmates…?
That still doesn’t fit with the “in a prison” either.
Critical thinking is seriously lacking in this world.
Well contextually you would know who the person was talking about…
If you saw a woman and confused it with a man because of word, that’s on you mate. There’s another gender neutral and singular term.
Ahah, you changed it plural which genders it. It’s dudes and dudettes in that case.
Did you see that dude I slept with last night?
Totally different now that it’s a singular.
Yeah language sucks.
Dude is supposed to be gender neutral and singular.
… so they are using their money makers to get their money makers out of prison…?
Still makes no sense that way, it’s obvious inmates have nothing to do with it.
And what part of “at a prison” means work release anyways?
So they’re gonna raise money to release their money makers? Thats the hitch in the thought process here.
Are people really thinking the government would spend money to grow weed to get people out of prison?
Seems obvious that it’s not actually inmates.
??? Multiple people have told you the same thing……
Sounds like you don’t want to admit that you fucked up.
It sounds a lot like you’re the one who is ignoring definitions to bitch and moan 👋
Well sounds is a lot different than being factually incorrect and obtuse like you….
These were the poster boy devices each brand trotted out to show off their capabilities. These were flagships.
Phones in general are bigger, in each of those examples, smaller models also exist. The flagship isn’t the SMALLEST model, which is what you’re wanting since they are just bigger.
So how does that support your point? Lmfao.
You just don’t know what the term flagship is supposed to mean and are conflating it with other stuff.
Thanks for pointing that out so well!
??? Plenty of people are pointing the same thing out
It’s just you swinging this dude, and I’ve provided proof that you’re wrong, you’ve cherry picked a single definition and I provided multiple separate sources. As well had to explain how the minimalists phone still wouldn’t by definition ever be the “flagship” of its small and has no features.
As you said, just fucking google it. You didn’t just look at one source now did you…? When researching you must look at more than a single source. Thats just being obtuse lmfao. If you “googled” it and did any actual investigating you should have seen that the deification you picked isn’t the standard one.
And again, op has clarified their stance. The minimalist phone isn’t what they want/need so you using it as an example is just asinine and shows you missed the point completely lmfao. Give your head a shake bud.
As I explained previously, you’re cherry picking definitions to support your point.
Multiple other definitions that I provided you contradict that, and just repeating and saying the same thing doesn’t suddenly make it true. Even with minimalist phone, it doesn’t have all the bells and whistles, which is another important criteria and you’re choosing to ignore to make your asinine point.
A flagship has never been a cigar boat and that’s exactly what OP has clarified they wanted. So I was correct all along.
They used to make small flagships.
When??? You keep saying that, but flagships have always been large and fancy and never small and fancy. Can you provide an example? Because what it seems from every explanation you’ve made in this thread, you just don’t know what the term flagship means…
Sounds like you just need to learn words properly, the only one wrong here is you using an established term incorrectly and are conflating a small phone as a “flagship” which has NEVER been the case. Please provide an example of a flagship being small and compact, I would love to see how you came to fuck this well established term up so horrendously.
So does regular hand writing. I can see this one being AI with how different the capital As are.