The powerful ones are called epyc.

latest amd ryzen chip and with 4tb of ssd and 16gb of ram

Why would you call that “powerful”?

connect them all to one display

The X Window System was invented originally with this idea. It can even connect multiple machines to multiple displays seamlessly.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Window_System

It still works fine, but after most people have been using it only on 1 PC and screen, they abandoned it in favor of Wayland.

Nowadays even self hosters, the cream of the crop of all nerds ;-) usually prefer headless servers and only 1 PC with many screens connected to it.

…which is derived from SGML.

deleted by creator

The standard (automated) attacker manipulates the ‘inside’ device first (for example, it executes a JavaScript) and makes it perform an attack on the WiFi router, to which the device is connected.

If the inside device is a windows pc and the WiFi router has it’s inside port open for administrative actions, this is an easy game. Millions of WiFi routers have been turned into bots this way.

In your case the WiFi router is windows. This is different from the usual plastic router, but still not really a safe situation.

The attacking bots will surely be liking all your ‘buts’ ;-)

Window only faces internally so I’m okay w it not getting support

There is room some future proofing.

All your mobile devices connect directly to that Windows. Consider them ‘unsafe’. Consider Windows ‘unsafe’ as well.

‘unsafe’ + ‘unsafe’ = incubator for all kinds of trouble IMHO.

sour apple spray

Doesn’t it attract ants etc?

Don’t they use linux for their own servers LOL?

Either a defective RAM or a physically broken (bent) mainboard.

Nah… vim users fight emacs users, but not nano users. Wrong league. We do not beat little children ;)