a digital to digital copy will be a 1 to 1 replication of the data, there’s no expectation of loss
You are mostly right, except this line. And I think I understand your meaning but I think it’s a little misleading.
A digital to digital copy can be a 1:1 replication. But just saying “digital to digital” doesn’t mean the copy process is lossless, there are a ton of lossy transfer methods. I don’t believe they are used when burning CDs (honestly not sure, but I googled it real quick) but just because it’s digital doesn’t mean it can’t have losses




Outcomes are rarely determined by your own thoughts about the situation.
It’s like being anxious about driving because you’re worried someone is going to hit you. As long as you’re being safe and careful, being an anxious mess isn’t going to make you any safer and it can even make things worse.
Of course I’m not trying to say “just stop being anxious!” but you have to understand that only ever thinking about the worst case scenario will hinder far more progress than it will help.