You have some dust on your lens! Next time you should take flat frames.

Great pic!

Definetely crosspost to !astrophotography@lemmy.world

From quick math with 500 rule (500/focal length ) it comes up with around 10s for your camera + lens. More frames means better image.

For F number use as low as possible and adjust ISO for balance.

For stacking use Dedicated program like DeepSkyStacker or Pixinsight. It will enable you to have hundredths of frames.

For more info check https://r-astrophotography.gitbook.io/r-astrophotography-wiki/stacking-dsos

If you want you can find an object on this map: https://www.skymaps.com/downloads.html and try to point the camera towards it. It’s harder than you might think.

Good luck and clear skies.

This is a satellite. Plane would have 2 coloured trails on wingtips.

Depending on the lens, the camera sensor and mount you could push it even further. There are calculators to calculate max exposure time.

If you describe in detail, what camera and lens where you using. ISO, time and f stops. How many frames have you taken? How and what exactly have you done for processing I can give you some tips.

Definitely cross post to !astrophotography@lemmy.world.

If you tell here and there what equipment and software have you used you can can get couple of tips from me and others.

I think you could have used longer exposure times.

I wasn’t precise with the point. Where should the logo be put? Laptop or webpage?

Different usages require different levels of speed of comprehension.

The horizontal lines, the colors and contrast help hide the different spelling of the first world. They all don’t convey a singular meseege.

In my non-expert opinion the first i should be in regular pride flag as second one is misspelled and should be highlighted. There is also problem of misreading F into E due to horizontal stripes.

Side note. Different therapy in my view is “Conversion Therapy” and I don’t think that is your point.

What is the point of this logo?

It’s not readable at a glance and misspelled. If that was the point then good job.

If it wasn’t, then you can learn from your mistakes.

Wait…

That orange swirl on her head isn’t a head accessory but an eye?

New lore just dropped.

Please, draw her at the time when she discovered the orange swirl.

Thanks, I have done exactly that. (root password)

Thank you

Draw her drawing herself.

With or without programming socks?

Flaneur’s most favorite button.

!internetfuneral@lemmy.world material

Honk_Rule

Double Kill

I think I can but I can’t really be sure that what we imagined is true. I can imagine 2+2=5 but it isn’t true.

Also there is aphantasia and whole gradient of imagining capabilities. What if only a subset of humans can imagine 4d objects.

My workflow: imagine a cube, imagine a second cube offset by 4D unit. connect the verticies.

IMO steve woudn’t kill it on sight but collect it like some sort of SCP. The roundest object in the game: dragon egg isn’t destroyed by most players.

4D golf has thought me otherwise. I even begun imagining simple 4d object in my mind.