

Those are ghost days, that’s why they’re translucent. We’ll all be dead then
Goddess of madness and rebirth. Excrucian Strategist. Capitalised They/Them. Anarcho-Antireal theorist.


Those are ghost days, that’s why they’re translucent. We’ll all be dead then


No, you need to ask the Hist for help


Let’s less assumptions next time and then less mistakes :3


This is easily explained by the fact OP is a femme and the maintainer is a misogynist


Computer science used to be for women until men realised there was money in it, and now they act like women are too stupid to understand it.


The good version of this is in Transformers One.
Orion Pax and D-16 just lead a revolution to overthrow the state, and are deciding what to do with the old head of state. D-16 wants to kill him and burn this motherfucker to the ground. But Orion reminds him that they’re creating a new government with their actions right now, and they need to embody the principles they want to see. D-16 doesn’t want to hear it because he’s angry. Orion gets in the way, and D-16 shoots him.
And that’s how Orion Pax gets the Matrix of Leadership and becomes Optimus Prime. By thinking about the future and what sort of world his actions are creating.
I’m a woke mob. Probably something cool like a woke ender dragon
I’ve seen that video. He sexually harassed his students, faced professional consequences, and blamed it on Woke.
Unc is AAVE for a beloved elder role model. Making fun of people for being old is for white kids
That kind of situation is a nice demonstration that economic theories which rely on people acting logically (Smith, Marx, etc.) are not true. People are mostly driven by intangible factors like ideology, loyalty, and complacency.
You’re right that transphobes are misinformed, but what I’m opposed to is not knowledge itself. Rather, it’s the conviction that objective answers exist and can be known. Transphobes believe they have the answers to the objective nature of gender. There are no such answers. Nobody can say for certain whether another’s gender is valid, because gender is just an idea. It is the transphobes’ realism that motivates them to uphold the gender binary.
Also, Pope Urban II called for the crusades to distract Europe from internal strife among the church. Nobody should have the power to tell an entire continent what Deus wills. They believed him because they thought religion has objective answers, and that those answers come from the Pope. Again, people’s conviction that anyone can be objectively correct is what caused the problem. If Christianity were antirealist, there could be no pope and no crusades.
Truly, the belief in an objective reality is history’s greatest problem.
I worry that the belief in and pursuit of objective reality has negative social ramifications. For example, transphobia is usually motivated by a belief in objective sex. We also see racism from belief in objective race, and religious genocides such as the Crusades and the colonisation of Latin America from belief in objective religion. While we have made significant strides in all these areas recently, people have not extended the same empathy to otherkin and plural systems, still convinced of objective species and objective personhood. I fear that an antirealist approach is the only way to ensure people seek continuous progress on these issues.
Given these limitations, our goal should not be closer and closer adherence to some unknowable objective reality, but instead more and more useful models in terms of their effect on the happiness of ourselves and others.


Flappers


You should ask some of the people in this thread out


@Mechoselachia@multiverse.soulism.net Found some people who are into you
Hahaha, that guy looks VERY cishet
What about in places rats are invasive?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mouse_plagues_in_Australia