i think they will. or worse yet they can make it without bios at all just device tree and all that garbage that phones do. then make it subsction based,filled with ai,cloud streamed only. no apps outside store. but thats too much orwellian stuff for now,i think what will happen is the locking bios thing for now.

what do you think?

  • aksdb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    No. Because the information is user provided and unverified, so there’s no reason to lock anything down that could increase security. Once they want attestation, they need a third party service involved, in which case the device being part of the trust-chain doesn’t make sense anymore.

  • BrilliantBadger@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Legit concern & lots of good comments on the device side of things so I’ll just toss in that another perhaps far easier approach for fascist regimes would be to force telcos, ISPs to permit online access only once registered, similar to a hotel guest WiFi. Only of course more rigidly enforced & monitored.

    Thus removing the device itself from the equation, and using infrastructure as the chokepoint.

    Future generations are largely doomed by the apathy of the “we have nothing to hide” folks of today, or those who buy into the its “for the children” movement.

    Horrifying for the generations to come, as it all advances from multiple angles to 1984 reality

  • meow@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I pretty much don’t care about how the future of laptops looks like. If you are stupid enough to buy that shit, you get what you asked for

    • TechNom (nobody)@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Open devices will be way costlier too. That’s the price of letting these demagogues get away with such abuses. Should have rubbed it in their faces.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Don’t buy computers with locked parts. Buy computers with non locked parts. Problem solved.

    • Anna@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It’s not that easy earlier all phones had unlocked or unlockable bootloader but now only few do. Even xiomi once hailed as cheap phone for custom ROMs now has unlockable bootloader

      • utopiah@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 hours ago

        now only few do

        That’s the one you buy then if that’s what matters to you.

        To be clear I’m not saying it’s “easy” or that the situation is “good”, only that there are choices and if we as consumers can support them, and as voted can support politicians that do make legislation to protect them (or at least not make others mandatory) then we are still going in the right direction, even if most people don’t care.

        • tuhriel@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          That’s the false premise…if we just buy the one which isn’t enshittified to hell, there’s less and less options for “enthusiasts” and secondly, most users are fucked, because they just need something that works.

          The only way to prevent keep the devices open is via regulatory oversight, forcing politicians to see the relevance of open platform / devices and create rules accordingly. And even that is a massive uphill battle…

  • bacon_pdp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The end goal of the elites is eliminating access to actual computers from the masses and using software to manipulate, spy on and control the masses.

    That is why libreboot and the Free Software community need active support.

    None of us can be free if any of us can’t choose freedom.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Amazing how governments opposed to MAGA/US fascism, ensure the tools for fascism. I will choose “illegal” phone, computer, 3d printer.

  • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    They can’t get all computing devices. If desktop PCs are done for, I’ll go to Raspberry Pis. There’s plenty of embedded and industrial computer systems that can be repurposed to use as a general purpose computer.

    The cyberpunk dystopia has arrived, prepare your tools and defenses accordingly.

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    The computers in the store, yes. I expect all computers in the store to be phones and the cell company will verify.

    Open Source computers will be more important. Might need to brush up on wire wrapping… (Implication being that chip supplies might become dedicated to only those manufacturers that lock the product down.)

  • fozid@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Nah computing as a service will be for the masses and mainstream user who doesn’t care, and they will have age verification and all the “security” measures included. The custom build and DIY setups won’t change at all. Any Linux / BSD distro can just be hosted in a territory that doesn’t require these “security” measures, then anybody who knows how to use them will be able to continue unaffected.

  • gilokee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    There will always be a couple companies going against the norm and make open devices. Or computers that are fully customizable IE just stick a different hard drive in there or whatever. I don’t think this will ever happen, regardless.

    • redparadise@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It doesn’t need to happen 100%, they simply need to kick any manufacturer making such open devices out of the affordable range for the masses, after all it’s only the poor that need not have access to knowledge.

      • redparadise@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Adding to this, it has already started happening on phones in the form of propreitary carrier locked devices being artificially cheaper than normal phones that you don’t even “own”, they are going for the ultra budget range first, then climb up from there, it will take a while to jump to computers but I absolutely see no reason for it to not start happening, after all the majority of users use Windows anyways, it can spread slowly.