… virtual machines where you only have to select which accompanying image of Arch / Tumbleweed / Ubuntu / Fedora you want to try.

In addition, the combination of a very stable base system (say, Debian or SuSE Leap) with a fast-moving, bleeading edge virtualized system (say, SuSE Tumbleweed, Arch or Guix) on top can be surprisingly useful. And because small virtual machines, when not running, are nothing else than files on your computer, you can have many versions of them, alter things, try stuff out, then delete it and go back to the tidy original state.

  • IanTwenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I moved to virt manager from boxes as I it let me down too many times with bugs. VMs would not restart and snapshots would fail to launch.

  • eneff@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    I really like Boxes, but since it can only run VMs in the unprivileged qemu:///session, it simply doesn’t support features like PCI passthrough, autostart or even slightly sophisticated networking setups. :/

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        i suspect that virt-manager is a supplement since you can do everything via virsh.

        • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          That’s right, virt-manager is a GUI with many, many options. It is more tailored to run several VMs at once, give limited network access into or out of them, and so on.

          Also very handy to run tiny, outdated Windows systems with an app you can’t get rid off isolated from the net because it runs your grandpa’s heart-lung machine or so.

          • eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            now that i think of it, it’s more than a supplement because it makes the software defined networking MUCH MORE intuitive if you’re using KVM/QEMU.

            • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah. Makes it also easy to share files between host and VM via NFS, which can be handy when running cooperating desktop systems.

              • eldavi@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                that too; i guess it’s wrong to call it a supplement when it unifies all these systems that seem disperate if you don’t already know the kvm/qemu ecosystem.

  • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Someone else brought up Virt Manager here, which is my preferred; if you’ve ever used VirtualBox, you’ll probably be fine on Virt Manager. I like Virt Manager for using GTK3, as I’m in XFCE. I wouldn’t be surprised if both applications have similar settings, as they’re both LibVirt front ends, it seems.

    Also, DistroBox, while a different sort of thing, is great for the sort of thing OP mentioned in that last paragraph. I usually just use command line, but there seems to be an unofficial GUI out there.

  • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Gnome boxes even downloads the iso for you. We should recommend it for new users over the other ones.

  • warmaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I run Bazzite which is immutable and rock solid stable. I use Boxbuddy which is a frontend for Distrobox to install packages from any distro when I can’t find it on brew.