Or is there maybe a way to set the pager for all help related queries to some command? I’m using bat and would like to pipe all --help through | bat --language=help by default for the syntax highlighting and colored output… Or if you know a lower effort way to color the output of --help let me know.

  • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    There has to be a hook somewhere for every command that executes. I’m not sure, but something in the chain after using set -x then running any terminal command likely is on the right path to doing this. (If you try set -x, you can turn it off with set +x). set -o options are another I’m not very familiar with but might be related.

    • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      set -x configures the running process, your shell. This is a posix standard flag. See https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html

      there has to be a hook somewhere for every command that executes

      Why do think this? I’m not aware of any shells that have such a feature. I’m not saying it couldn’t be done, but it would be a new feature.

      I like the other suggestion of having a wrapper script that does what you need.

      • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t mind the idea of a wrapper it is just that most of the time, I’m looking at the last command, backspacing and then adding --help. After thinking about it, I will likely go the wrapper route, but add arguments that use the last command in terminal history automatically so that typing help- with no args runs a --help flag on that last command, 2::5 would add additional flags or arguments from the last command before --help and help- with any other args calls those instead of using history.

    • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’d be intercepting all commands just to verify if they have a help flag and then if not executing them as they were intended. If the intercept got broke, then the shell would be completely broken.

        • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Not everything uses groff. A lot will have their own function or another.

          Edit: I think for what you indicting you are wanting to try you’d need to either patch your shell of choice or write your own.

          Edit2: If you did patch it, the best way I can think of to get something upstreamed would be to patch bash to use CTRL-Enter to automatically pipe the output to the default pager defined in BASHPAGER followed by PAGER if it doesn’t exist. Then set the BASHPAGER to your “bat” command.

          • Ephera@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Frankly, I would be surprised, if anything uses groff for displaying --help, unless it shows the man page for that.
            The most basic implementation of --help is a manually formatted multi-line string written into the source code, which gets printed as-is.
            For dynamic layouting, you do need more logic, but rendering it to groff source code first does not make that easier. For tabbing, you print an appropriate number of \t.

            • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I agree, I just didn’t want to make assumptions about how newer things work with localization these days.

          • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            At this point, someone has to have already made a prettier shell or terminal that is configured like this by default. Hideous 1950s monocolor --help output can’t be a novel issue in 2025.

            • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              16 Color terminals didn’t really start getting used until the 90s and early 2000s. And 256 after that. A lot of software was written back then and it would take a lot to add something that might not display well because of the terminal’s color scheme and now we have color theming.

                • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  I am getting the feeling the you are mis-understanding than each project has their own independent implementing function and that each one would need to be rewritten. There a 10 of thousands of projects. This is not some simple, change 1 project task.

                  • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 hours ago

                    Why are you confrontational? I’m just casually tossing out ideas and learning. Of course I understand what you are saying. However, busybox covers the core of a POSIX system and with the size constraints, it is likely standardising something like this. On Gentoo, such a change might be more straight forward instead of some sloppy hack with a wrapper.

                    I imagine you must be good at memorizing a lot of information. I am not. I am good at abstraction and must explore in abstraction to understand heuristically. I understand heuristic connections better than most people. Neither method is better or worse. Being toxic about interchanges of information is useless nonsense. I know far more than I let on, but I’m well aware that I am a jack of all trades and expert of none. All the projects don’t matter relative to those that are used the most. If most projects can be colorized, it will motivate others to fall in line or prompt rewrites assuming such a change was popular. Colorized manpages and help pages should be standard and should have been a decade ago. No one is using an IDE without syntax highlighting. The terminal is an extension of the abstracted language of Linux. Without universal syntax highlighting for new users in these spaces, Linux is presenting an outdated language format ripe for deprecation. These details have long term consequences.